The U.S. Retreat from Agent Orange Cleanup in Vietnam

More than 50 years ago, the United States deployed a toxin known as Agent Orange during the war in Vietnam. Today, that poison still lingers—in the soil, in the water, and in the bodies of those who were exposed to it. Agent Orange was meant to strip away jungle cover during the war, but its deadly dioxin has seeped into generations, causing birth defects, cancers, and untold suffering.

Now, with the U.S. pulling back USAID funding for critical cleanup efforts, we are walking away from a moral obligation that we should have fulfilled long ago. Cutting waste is one thing—abandoning responsibility is another.

The Context: Agent Orange and Its Lasting Legacy

Between 1961 and 1971, the United States military sprayed approximately 19 million gallons of herbicides, including Agent Orange, across Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos. This was done as part of Operation Ranch Hand, a defoliation campaign aimed at depriving the enemy of cover. The toxic dioxin compound in Agent Orange, however, led to widespread environmental contamination and devastating health consequences for both the Vietnamese population and U.S. veterans.

The most significant and continuing impact of Agent Orange is the contamination of soil and water, which still harbors the toxic dioxin. Areas that were heavily sprayed, such as the Bien Hoa airbase, have been identified as hotspots for residual contamination. Decades later, survivors of Agent Orange exposure are still suffering from cancers, birth defects, and other serious health conditions. Generations of Vietnamese children are born with deformities, and entire communities remain at risk of contamination. U.S. veterans who were exposed to Agent Orange have also experienced elevated rates of chronic illnesses, including Parkinson’s disease, ischemic heart disease, and various cancers.

While the United States has taken some steps to acknowledge the environmental and human toll of Agent Orange—such as providing financial assistance for cleanup and health care—these efforts are insufficient when compared to the scale of the destruction caused by the chemical warfare. With the cuts to USAID’s funding for these projects, we are now witnessing a retreat from the responsibility that the U.S. has for the mess it made. The Trump administration’s executive order to halt foreign aid funding has resulted in the cessation of remediation work at sites like the Bien Hoa air base, leaving contaminated areas exposed and raising environmental and public health concerns.

America’s Responsibility

The argument for funding Agent Orange cleanup efforts is not just about goodwill or diplomacy. It is about taking responsibility for actions that continue to harm those caught in their wake. The U.S. government has long been a global leader, touting the values of democracy, human rights, and accountability. However, these values ring hollow when America fails to take ownership of the consequences of its past military engagements. The toxic legacy of Agent Orange is a testament to the long-lasting scars of war—scars that the U.S. must now help heal.

Photo by The New York Public Library on Unsplash

This cleanup effort is not just about mitigating an environmental disaster; it is about fulfilling a moral obligation to the people of Vietnam and ensuring that future generations do not suffer from the same fate. As recent studies have shown, dioxin exposure continues to impact newborns, with congenital disabilities and developmental disorders surfacing decades after the war ended. Every year that cleanup efforts are delayed, more lives are affected. The U.S. cannot ignore the generational impact of this disaster.

Government Spending and Accountability

Of course, there are always concerns about government spending, particularly in an era of budget cuts and fiscal conservatism. Taxpayer money must be managed responsibly, and wasteful programs should be scrutinized. I wholeheartedly agree with the need for reviewing government spending, cutting unnecessary expenditures, and ensuring that taxpayer money is used efficiently. However, it is essential to differentiate between wasteful spending and morally required action. Cleaning up the devastation of Agent Orange is not wasteful. It is an ethical duty.

Cutting back on these cleanup efforts under the guise of fiscal restraint is shortsighted. The lasting effects of Agent Orange on human lives and the environment cannot be understated. Further delay in the cleanup could result in more significant costs in the future—costs related to public health, further environmental damage, and international relations. The U.S. cannot afford to ignore the implications of leaving this task unfinished.

A Path Forward

As a global superpower, the U.S. has the capacity and the moral obligation to take the lead on issues of international justice, even when those issues arise from its own past actions. The international community is watching how the U.S. will handle this issue, and the decisions made today will reverberate for generations.

It's essential to continue providing funding for the cleanup of Agent Orange sites and invest in ongoing medical care for those affected. This is not about charity or “handouts”; it’s about righting a wrong and fulfilling a responsibility. Vietnam, and those affected by the lasting consequences of Agent Orange, are not asking for charity—they are asking for justice, and the U.S. must answer that call.

While it's understandable that there will always be debates over how to allocate foreign aid, the damage caused by Agent Orange cannot be ignored any longer. The cuts to USAID’s cleanup program represent a failure to take full responsibility for past actions. If America truly believes in its values of responsibility and accountability, then it must commit to righting the wrongs of its past, even if that requires making difficult decisions about government spending.

America's history in Vietnam cannot be erased, but it can be addressed. The decision to halt or reduce the funding for the Agent Orange cleanup effort is a mistake, one that will only prolong the suffering of those impacted by the herbicide’s legacy.

When we talk about being accountable for our actions, we must understand that some wrongs cannot be corrected with money alone. They require time, dedication, and a sincere effort to make amends.

Actions have consequences. Let us not forget that we are all responsible for the legacies we leave behind.

FOR EXCLUSIVE GLOBAL CONTENT AND DIRECT MESSAGING, PLEASE CONSIDER A PAID SUBSCRIPTION TO THIS SUBSTACK TO HELP KEEP INDEPENDENT, AGENDA-FREE WRITING AND JOURNALISM ALIVE. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR SUPPORT.

For speaking queries please contact meta@metaspeakers.org

For ghostwriting, personalized mentoring or other writing/work-related queries please contact hollie@holliemckay.com

Follow me on Instagram and Twitter for more updates

Click to Purchase All Books Here